As always, click the images for bigger versions.Last year men used the terms "skeptic," "freethinker," and "anti-theist" more often than women. This year "anti-theist" is still used more, but "skeptic" and "freethinker" are not significantly different. However, "atheist" and "infidel" were used less by women now. There's a general trend of women avoiding terms that tend to have negative associations.
I'm intrigued by the changes in term usage since last year. All of the labels except "freethinker" were selected by a smaller percentage of readers this year. "Atheist" was hit particularly hard, dropping from 82% to 42%. The next biggest change was for "agnostic," dropping from 23% to a measly 3%. I think the most likely explanation is that I'm attracting a much broader readership, while I originally started out predominantly as an atheist blog.
Oh, and most people still hate the label "Bright." Wah wah.
Favorite open responses:
- Evil baby-eating atheist
- Baby-eater (I'm seeing a trend)
- BAMF (Again, a trend...)
- He Who Shall Not Be Named
- Chaotic good
- Bipedal furhead
- Devoutly in the awe of the unknown
- "Indifferent agnostic" - it's not that I don't know, it's that I don't really care
- I'm not a pastafarian, but I do think they are sexy. Is that ok? (Yes)
I was a little surprised that the only gender difference was in writing letters to the editor (anyone have an explanation for that?). I guess from personal experience I expected women to participate less. Of course, there are two potential problems here. One, this doesn't look at the frequency of these events - maybe they showed up to a single event or wrote a single blog post. Two, we have a biased sample - these are women who are already reading at least one atheist blog (mine), not women in general.This one surprised me a bit. I thought everyone would keep updated about the blog using some sort of RSS reader, like Google Reader or Blogger Dashboard, mainly because that's what I do. Apparently slightly more people manually check the blog through bookmarking or some other sort of link. I have 3,928 subscribers. Using this updating method data as an estimate, I probably have approximately 8,000 readers. Wow! Not to shabby for a 2 year old blog.
Twitter and Facebook are rarely used on their own, but rather in addition to another method. Though you can see a slight difference when seeing how much people comment:It seems that people who use Twitter and Facebook, either alone or in addition to bookmarks or RSS feeds, are more likely to comment. Maybe they use those things because they're more socially interactive online in general?
But overall, a very small percentage of my readers make up the vast majority of the comments. Hello, all of you lurkers out there! Though an interesting trend is seen when you break it up by gender:Ladies! Why aren't you commenting as much?! No wonder blogs can look so male dominated. Seriously though, why are women less likely to comment? Are we less inclined to speak up thanks to social conditioning? Is there something about the environment in the comments that make them seem unwelcoming? If you're a lurker (lady or otherwise), please let me know. I'm generally curious, but I also want to make sure my blog is a place where you can feel comfortable.I guess a 5 point Likert scale wasn't the best way to ask this question, since if you stick around to read Blag Hag, you probably like most of the topics. Oh well. I should check to see if non-US readers are the most apathetic about politics, and if everyone but graduate students are apathetic about my grad school posts, haha. Other than that, I didn't get too much out of this question. Going to keep doin' what I've been doing.
The only topic that differed between the sexes was Feminism:Women readers really like when I talk about feminism. Shocking, I know. Thankfully my male readers still generally like it! ...Of course, I've probably scared off all the dudes who can't stand it. Hm.
A couple interesting things on how people found my blog:
- If you want readers, get Pharyngulated. PZ has the power. Though he seems to send mostly guys over. I'd be really interested to see the gender makeup of his readership - is it really that male biased? I wonder what my gender ratio would look like if you took out the Pharyngulites...
- Boobquake attracted equal numbers of male and female readers. Take that, haters who say it's only guys sticking around for my boobs!
- More women seem to find their way here after being referred by friends (or according to some comments, family). Maybe this is their first step into the atheist community? Regardless, thanks for recommending my blog to friends!
- Of the "Other blogs" specified, the most common mentioned were Dan Savage (25), Skepchick (10), Greta Christina (2), Daylight Atheism (2), and Boing Boing (2), JT Eberhard (2), and "feminist blogs" (2).
- Webcomics - Something Positive (5), Girls with Slingshots (2), Wapsi Square (1)
- The Bloggies (5)
- Flyers for my speaking events (3)
- Met at convention or group (9)
- "Your landlord" (...This is kind of scary)
- OkCupid (Nope, this is scarier, haha)
- "Jesus made it come to me in a dream" (Oddly less scary)
Like always, feel free to discuss in the comments.