Thursday, April 8, 2010

A Christian, a Muslim, and an atheist walk into an classroom...

Today I took part in a religious diversity panel for an agriculture class at Purdue, Communicating Across Cultures. I was on the same panel representing atheists last year, which was a giant debacle that left a bad taste in my mouth. I decided to try again this year and hope for the best.

I have to say, it went much better. This time I was actually told that I was supposed to have a presentation prepared, and I was told the accurate topic (yes, last year was bad). I had limited time for my presentation, but here's a brief outline of what I talked about.

- Definition for atheism and agnosticism
- Demographics of atheists in US
- Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, I can be convinced
- Secular humanism and general ideals some atheist have (search for truth, reason, evidence, concern for this life, ethics)
- Why atheism is not a religion
- Not all atheists hate religion (though some do), and we don't hate religious people. In fact, most atheists were at one point religious.
- Atheists are not depressed, angry, hopeless people

The Muslim speaker (a recently graduated student) did an excellent job at explaining exactly what Muslims believe and some of their traditions. The Christian speaker (a pastor for Alpha Chi, the group with the zombie event), while very nice, was one giant facepalm. I really shouldn't be allowed to be on panels or do debates, because I make a very obvious "What you're saying is stupid and annoys me but I have to look polite" grimace, like so:It wasn't her description of her belief that annoyed me. I disagreed with her just as much about there being proof of Jesus rising from the dead (uh, care to share that with us atheists?) and Intelligent design being proof for God's existence (No) as I did with the Muslim talking about Mohammed being a prophet. I've heard the arguments before and I don't agree with them, but the whole point of the panel was diversity, so they were totally appropriate.

What annoyed me is that she felt the need to comment on people other than Christians. Namely, atheists. To summarize her argument:

You know how when you were a little kid, and your parents forced you to go to bed at a certain time and eat your vegetables? And at the time you hated them and whined and resisted, but now looking back you thank them for being good parents? That's God. Atheists don't like that God's a meanie and makes them do things they don't like, so they rebel and go to the extreme and say he doesn't exist. Atheists need to realize that God is all loving, and he makes rules in our best interest.

...

First off, when I was a little kid I went to bed at my curfew and ate whatever my parents told me to ate and never threw tantrums.

*ahem*

Really? Did she even listen to the talk I gave? I had just got done saying how atheists usually come to that conclusion after many many years of thought and introspection. That we weighed the evidence, and it wasn't even enough to jiggle the scale. That we live by many of the same moral rules as religious people. That if given sufficient evidence, we would totally not hesitate in believing in God.

But no, atheists are just rebellious, selfish people who don't want to conform to God's rules. It's just so fucking condescending, which is highly ironic considering it's always the atheists who get labeled as the pompous jerks. I don't think she was saying this to be mean, or even consciously aware of how bad it sounded - she really seemed like a legitimately nice woman. I didn't go up and say how only atheists use reason and logic, and that theists are dumbasses. Blaaarrgghh.

One of the questions during the Q&A for me was what sort of evidence it would take to convince me that God exists. I gave my standard quip, that "If God is all knowing, he'll know what will convince me," which the pastor actually liked and agreed with. Then I added "Or he could make a trout materialize in front of me right now." I paused, but no trout. Sadness. That was your chance, God!

Most of the other questions for me were pretty standard - Do you believe in a soul? (No) Where do you think you'll go when you die? (In the ground) What do you think the purpose of life is? (There isn't a preordained purpose, but we chose to give our lives purpose). How do you get along with religious people? (Just like someone with different political beliefs, you try to put it aside and find other things you have in common). I wish we had more time in the Q&A, because there were good questions we ran out of time for (exactly where do you get your morals, and how can morality evolve?). But since the class seemed so interested, the professor is going to email me the questions and let me answer them, and then she's going to give my answers to the students.

I also really would have liked to address all the arguments the pastor was making. When she feels down, she asks God for strength and it makes her feel better (feeling better doesn't mean he exists). When she looks at nature, she knows it couldn't have come about by chance (it's evolution, not chance). She hears the voice of God speaking to her, therefore she exists (you might want to get that hearing voices thing checked out).

But more importantly, atheists aren't just some rebellious cranky kids who want to be able to run around having promiscuous sex and drunken parties! The ironic part is that she agreed that we have similar morals and care about the well being of others and want to live happy lives...so what exactly are we rejecting? An all loving God? Heaven? Yeah, I would just hate to have those things.

All in all, I still think the panel was a success. At the beginning of the talk, one girl said she didn't know what the word "atheism" meant - hopefully now she does. And while I probably didn't make any converts, I think it helped for them to see that an atheist is just a normal, happy person. They might think I'm wrong, but hopefully they won't hate me.

19 comments:

  1. Time to troll the exponent as a fake Ag Student.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow. Fail. I'm glad I'm way past college, heh.
    ReplyDelete
  3. HA! If I ever see you in person, I'd be tempted to say something stupid just to see that hilarious expression. :P
    ReplyDelete
  4. My favorite response to "Where do you go when you die?" is another question: "Where were you before you were born?" I asked someone that once, and they gave a thoughtful look and said "huh... I guess I never thought about it that way."
    ReplyDelete
  5. But more importantly, atheists aren't just some rebellious cranky kids who want to be able to run around having promiscuous sex and drunken parties!

    Well why the fuck did I join this group then?
    ReplyDelete
  6. Moar cartoons of event, we can has, Jen? Plz?
    ReplyDelete
  7. Are atheists allowed to be offended when people accuse us of being bitter people who hate god? Because I really want to be.

    If so, I have an analogy for how offensive that statement is that I really want to start using.

    Its like saying all black people are fat because they like fried chicken.
    ReplyDelete
  8. @NQbass7 Great response. Mind if I use it?
    ReplyDelete
  9. Unfortunately, believers don't realize they are being condescending and arrogant when they say the stupid things they do. I tend to keep my mouth shut for the most part in real life when someone says something stupid like that, since I have to live around these people, but online I never put up with that shit.

    Anyway, I'm glad you feel you did good. It sounds like you did well to me too.
    ReplyDelete
  10. @NQbass7: Yeah, that's a great line. My best pal Arthur Schopenhauer uses it too. I've done some work on the syntax of death; our language is structured around some horrendous assumptions and it's actually rather hard to tell it as it is. For example, "he is dead" postulates a "he" to whom we can attach predicates, thus forcing us to think of him as somehow still being. "Where do you go when you die?" is a whole lot worse, as it begs the question quite horrendously. I reckon that the problem is with denoting ourselves by (pro)nouns, when we are really verbs. For example, we might say that it is currently Jenning, or there is some Jenning being done, but that one day it will cease to Jen, or there will no longer be any Jenning going on; and then the question of where the Jenning goes after it has ceased to Jen is easier to see as meaningless. (Yeah, I know that sounds like the Dead Parrot sketch........ )

    Pedantic suggestion, though: make it "Where were you before you were conceived?" as there's no particular problem about where we were a week before we were born.
    ReplyDelete
  11. Congrats Jen, sounds like it went well. Great you had so many questions and the Prof is letting you follow up on some more. You should definately take advantage of that opportunity and address some of the pastor's comments as well.

    Quatguy
    ReplyDelete
  12. Okay, that damn cartoon is just hilarious. Even better when slipped into the middle of a discussion about your religious discussion panel! I'm at work for goodness sake! I can't be laughing like that in the middle of a serious post! :D
    ReplyDelete
  13. "When she feels down, she asks God for strength and it makes her feel better"

    When I was a Christian, whenever I would get overwhelmed with my kids, I would go in the bathroom for a few minutes (the only quiet place) and ask god to give me patience and strength. And I always had more patience and strength after. For years this was confirmation for me that god existed.

    Interestingly, after I stopped believing in god and became an atheist, I was feeling overwhelmed one day, so I went in the bathroom and took a minute to remind myself that I needed to have patience and be strong. Amazingly, I felt so much more patient and strong when I came out. I was like, wow, all this time, I just needed a minute to collect myself and draw from my inner strength. God had nothing to do with it!
    ReplyDelete
  14. I have a catch-all argument against theism that you're free to use:

    "Hey theists! You guys all believe in some for of god or goddess or plurals of one or both. I don't believe in any of it. I'll give it a more than fair hearing if all of you can get together and agree on ONE definition. Until them? If you believers can't agree on a definition, how the hell am I supposed to know which one to choose?"
    ReplyDelete
  15. Improbable Joe, I like it. It's very reminiscent of Dawkins' line: "We are all atheists about most of the gods humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further."

    I think we're on very solid ground when we point out the fact that multitudes of religions exist, explicitly contradicting each other in particulars, and all justified by their proponents on essentially the same grounds.
    ReplyDelete
  16. @Charity: I like your point. A religionist could equally well assert that praying to god is what keeps her heart beating and her kidneys filtering and her spleen doing whatever it that spleens do. Give up theism, and surprise surprise, her organs continue to strut their stuff. The human mind is what it is, and works as it works. Neuroengineering does not require gods.
    ReplyDelete
  17. I'm so glad that I live in Australia where being an atheist is no big deal. We've even had a Prime Minister or two who made no bones about not being religious!

    It's a shame that there's such a common perception that being non-religious must therefore mean that you're actively anti-religious. I've had (jocular) comments about me being unable to enter a church to attend weddings and such. "Why not?" I answer. "It's just a building..."
    ReplyDelete
  18. I just found your blog via an LA Atheism Examiner story about Atheist Barbie. I'm so glad I clicked the link ... Great stuff here!
    ReplyDelete
  19. One of the rebuttals I love about why Atheists are in fact superior to Theists is that a theist has to be offered eternity in paradise before they'll do something nice for someone. An Atheist does nice things because they're nice with no hope of eternal reward.

    It's always nice to see an Ambassador of Atheism show the world, especially the more devout parts, that we're decent, reasonable people who aren't just interested in fornication and fart-jokes.
    ReplyDelete