In an email, Boehner spokesman Kevin Smith said Boehner "supports existing federal protections (based on race, religion, gender, etc) based on immutable characteristics." ..."He does not support adding sexual orientation to the list of protected classes," Smith continued.What the hell, really? How many scientific studies do we need to throw at you ignorant bigots before you'll accept that homosexuality has a genetic basis?! This is not a matter of opinion - homosexuality is not a choice. That assertion is usually enough to make me want to bash my head against a wall, but coupled with the ludicrous claim that religion is immutable? Yes, because people never ever change religions, and adopted children always grow up to be the faith of their biological parents. Thanks for submitting that Christian gene sequence to GenBank, really interesting to know a single point mutation can make someone phenotypically Muslim!
Yes, I know - sexuality is fluid. There are definitely cases of people who once identified as straight as later identifying as gay and vice versa. There are bisexuals whose attractions skew back and forth over time. But immutability shouldn't be the sole deciding factor for what becomes a protected class. Even if people change their religion, gender, and sexual orientation, they shouldn't be discriminated for it. Regardless, it's obvious this man isn't talking about fluid sexuality - he's talking about homosexuality being a "choice," and that what annoys me so much.
It terrifies me that people like this get elected to public office.